Traders · daily edition

Leaderboard

Tracked Hyperliquid wallets, graded on one scale.

Sat, Sep 26

Rank by

Return, edge, risk/reward and discipline, minus penalties for liquidations, revenge trades and oversizing. The only ranking here that measures process, not outcome.

Traders ranked1

Last 7 daysSep 19 – Sep 26

Last updatedSep 26, 00:27 UTC

Ranked by Grade score

Graded from Hyperliquid's top 200 wallets by 7-day volume plus every wallet registered with Perpscore. That's a slice of Hyperliquid, not all of it. 14 wallets graded in this edition.

Ranked wallets need at least 10 closed trades and $5k of volume in the window, so a single lucky trade can't outrank a steady week.

How rankings work

Grade score: Return, edge, risk/reward and discipline, minus penalties for liquidations, revenge trades and oversizing. The only ranking here that measures process, not outcome.
Net P&L: Favours the largest accounts. A $10M wallet up 0.4% outranks a $5k wallet up 80%, and neither number says how much risk bought it.
Return: Favours the smallest accounts, where one trade can be a 40% swing. Wallets whose starting value we can't establish rank last rather than being guessed.
Win rate: Misleading alone: nine small wins and one big loss reads as 90% and still lost money. Read it next to profit factor.
Profit factor: Gross wins over gross losses. Unstable on small samples, so the minimum-trades bar applies on both tabs. A wallet with no losing trades shows ∞ and sorts first.
Volume: Activity, not skill. A busy wallet losing money steadily tops this ranking. It's here because people ask for it.

Whatever the ordering, the bar stays: 10 closed trades and $5,000 of volume on the Traders board. How grading works